<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Bookworm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bookworm.pilcrow.biz/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bookworm.pilcrow.biz</link>
	<description>Writing about reading</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 23:44:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Another post about Patrick O&#8217;Brian by judith stonebridge</title>
		<link>http://bookworm.pilcrow.biz/2007/06/02/another-post-about-patrick-obrian/comment-page-1/#comment-165406</link>
		<dc:creator>judith stonebridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 23:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bookworm.pilcrow.biz/2007/06/02/another-post-about-patrick-obrian/#comment-165406</guid>
		<description>Stephen&#039;s laughter - &quot;a creaking sound.&quot;

This is a fairly common type of laughter in some people, made at the back of the mouth, a kind of scratchy, and yes &quot;creaky&quot;, growly sound.  The opposite of a full bodied HA HA HA with mouth wide open.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen&#8217;s laughter &#8211; &#8220;a creaking sound.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is a fairly common type of laughter in some people, made at the back of the mouth, a kind of scratchy, and yes &#8220;creaky&#8221;, growly sound.  The opposite of a full bodied HA HA HA with mouth wide open.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lena&#8217;s review: Hugo Pepper by MollZzz</title>
		<link>http://bookworm.pilcrow.biz/2008/07/25/lenas-review-hugo-pepper/comment-page-1/#comment-165402</link>
		<dc:creator>MollZzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 03:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bookworm.pilcrow.biz/?p=541#comment-165402</guid>
		<description>This book is an awesome book. I recommend this book to children around 9 to 12 years old. :) By the way, Lena, your description is really good. I feel like reading it again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This book is an awesome book. I recommend this book to children around 9 to 12 years old. :) By the way, Lena, your description is really good. I feel like reading it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Yippee! A banned book list! by Julie</title>
		<link>http://bookworm.pilcrow.biz/2008/06/01/yippee-a-banned-book-list/comment-page-1/#comment-165400</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 14:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bookworm.pilcrow.biz/?p=414#comment-165400</guid>
		<description>Thank you Linda!!! Hope you&#039;re reading some good banned books this week!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Linda!!! Hope you&#8217;re reading some good banned books this week!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Yippee! A banned book list! by Linda</title>
		<link>http://bookworm.pilcrow.biz/2008/06/01/yippee-a-banned-book-list/comment-page-1/#comment-165399</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 14:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bookworm.pilcrow.biz/?p=414#comment-165399</guid>
		<description>Caitlyn, If you don&#039;t like a book or an author then don&#039;t read it!!  Maybe some of the books that you do like others don&#039;t.  Maybe those other people will ban the books that you like.  Please don&#039;t pass judgement on others or the books that they like to read.  I love to read, and thanks to Harry Potter books my daughter loves to read, and she has dyslexia.  I really don&#039;t understand why some of these books are banned like Little House on the Prairie, Diary of Ann Frank, And Mark Twain books..  What a shame.. If we start banning books it will be like Nazi Germany They banned the Bible</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Caitlyn, If you don&#8217;t like a book or an author then don&#8217;t read it!!  Maybe some of the books that you do like others don&#8217;t.  Maybe those other people will ban the books that you like.  Please don&#8217;t pass judgement on others or the books that they like to read.  I love to read, and thanks to Harry Potter books my daughter loves to read, and she has dyslexia.  I really don&#8217;t understand why some of these books are banned like Little House on the Prairie, Diary of Ann Frank, And Mark Twain books..  What a shame.. If we start banning books it will be like Nazi Germany They banned the Bible</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The sincerest form of flattery, perhaps by Phyllis MacCameron</title>
		<link>http://bookworm.pilcrow.biz/2007/07/24/the-sincerest-form-of-flattery-perhaps/comment-page-1/#comment-165394</link>
		<dc:creator>Phyllis MacCameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 00:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bookworm.pilcrow.biz/2007/07/24/the-sincerest-form-of-flattery-perhaps/#comment-165394</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m relieved, too, to hear that there is any discussion of this out there in the world.  It has bothered and intrigued me from time to time for years! 

I don&#039;t know what to think, especially since Irving has lived in Toronto,and the subject must have come up in Canadian circles.  It is curious that the parallels between the two books are not more widely discussed; the Wikipedia article, for example, cites other influences for Owen Meany but not that one. Clearly there has been no scandal.  Since Irving&#039;s book was published long before Davies&#039; death, it seems logical to infer that the borrowing was benign, perhaps homage or perhaps in a &quot;watch me do this!&quot; vein that seems consistent with Irving&#039;s literary acrobatics and might not have been at all disturbing to Davies. I found in some brief online research that Irving listed _The Fifth Business_ among his top ten books. There may be some information that we do not know about a connection between the two authors.

Stoppard&#039;s debt to Shakespeare is to my mind quite different even if Irving&#039;s borrowing is to be considered benign. Like Leonard Bernstein with _West Side Story_, and Jane Smiley with _A Thousand Acres_, Stoppard is using material that is so entirely well known as to be instantly recognizable.  The potential problem with the Irving/Davies thing is that Davies&#039; book is not known by absolutely everybody the way Shakespeare&#039;s plays are.  To students who are trying to figure out where the line between legitimate use and plagiarism lies, one might say simply that if half the world would catch your reference, it&#039;s not plagiarism; it&#039;s allusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m relieved, too, to hear that there is any discussion of this out there in the world.  It has bothered and intrigued me from time to time for years! </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what to think, especially since Irving has lived in Toronto,and the subject must have come up in Canadian circles.  It is curious that the parallels between the two books are not more widely discussed; the Wikipedia article, for example, cites other influences for Owen Meany but not that one. Clearly there has been no scandal.  Since Irving&#8217;s book was published long before Davies&#8217; death, it seems logical to infer that the borrowing was benign, perhaps homage or perhaps in a &#8220;watch me do this!&#8221; vein that seems consistent with Irving&#8217;s literary acrobatics and might not have been at all disturbing to Davies. I found in some brief online research that Irving listed _The Fifth Business_ among his top ten books. There may be some information that we do not know about a connection between the two authors.</p>
<p>Stoppard&#8217;s debt to Shakespeare is to my mind quite different even if Irving&#8217;s borrowing is to be considered benign. Like Leonard Bernstein with _West Side Story_, and Jane Smiley with _A Thousand Acres_, Stoppard is using material that is so entirely well known as to be instantly recognizable.  The potential problem with the Irving/Davies thing is that Davies&#8217; book is not known by absolutely everybody the way Shakespeare&#8217;s plays are.  To students who are trying to figure out where the line between legitimate use and plagiarism lies, one might say simply that if half the world would catch your reference, it&#8217;s not plagiarism; it&#8217;s allusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

